AFCA Upholds Insurer’s Decision in Breast Cancer Claim Case

2

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The woman was diagnosed with cancer in her right breast on October 5 of last year, followed by the discovery of cancer in her left breast eight days later. She filed claims under her critical illness policy that she had obtained on July 17.

However, TAL Life, her insurance provider, rejected the claims based on the policy's three-month qualifying period for cancer coverage.

In its ruling, AFCA noted that the policy had provisions to potentially waive the qualifying period if the policyholder could prove they were insured either under a previous TAL policy or by another insurer for the same events, right before their new coverage commenced.

The claimant contended that she had cancer coverage through an insurance policy provided by her husband's employer. She presented a letter from the employer affirming that she was covered under a "life, accident, critical illness, and medical insurance" scheme from August 2020 until June last year. Additionally, she showed documentation indicating her husband’s policy did include critical illness coverage for spouses, encompassing cancer.

While AFCA accepted the availability of this cancer coverage, it was not convinced that she held such coverage "immediately before the current policy began." It also noted she had failed to disclose her previous insurance when applying for the new policy with TAL Life.

"There is no information before me about the extent of the critical illness cover the complainant had, if any, through her husband's employer’s insurance arrangements," AFCA’s ombudsman stated.

"Furthermore, it appears that any cover she might have had ceased about a month before the new policy started. I am not convinced there was 'continuity of cover' as suggested by the complainant."

The ombudsman expressed AFCA’s sympathy towards the claimant, especially given that the diagnoses occurred "very close to the end of the qualifying period." Nonetheless, he emphasized that there was no valid reason for the qualifying period to be dismissed.

"The qualifying period is reasonably short and its existence is not unjust. These terms are part of all insurance policies and they draw necessary boundaries. The enforcement of these terms is not inherently unfair," the ombudsman elaborated.

For a more detailed account of the ruling, refer to the original report by AFCA.

Published:Wednesday, 4th Sep 2024
Source: Paige Estritori

Please Note: If this information affects you, seek advice from a licensed professional.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

Treasury's Initiative to Bolster Professional Indemnity Insurance and CSLR

17 Feb 2026: Paige Estritori

The Australian Treasury has commenced a consultation process aimed at improving the effectiveness of professional indemnity (PI) insurance, with the goal of strengthening the Compensation Scheme of Last Resort (CSLR). This initiative seeks to gather stakeholder feedback on the current operation of PI insurance and explore opportunities for enhancement. - read more

Sterling Insurance's New Lloyd's Binder: A Boost for Professional Indemnity Offerings

17 Feb 2026: Paige Estritori

Sterling Insurance has announced the acquisition of a new professional indemnity (PI) binding authority with Lloyd's, a move set to provide Australian brokers with greater control over product offerings and pricing structures. This development is part of Sterling's ongoing commitment to delivering tailored insurance solutions that meet the specific needs of niche and complex risk sectors. - read more

APRA Reports Surge in Public Liability and Professional Indemnity Insurance Costs

17 Feb 2026: Paige Estritori

The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has released its latest National Claims and Policies Database (NCPD) statistics, highlighting a significant increase in public liability and professional indemnity (PI) insurance premiums. This trend poses financial challenges for businesses across the nation. - read more

CHU Publishes 2025 State of the Strata Market Report

17 Feb 2026: Paige Estritori

CHU, Australia's largest strata insurance underwriting agency, has released its 2025 State of the Strata Market report, providing a comprehensive analysis of key industry statistics, trends, and market forces shaping the strata sector. The report addresses critical areas such as affordability, climate-related risks, regulatory reforms, and emerging challenges. - read more

ICA Advocates for Reforms in Victoria's Strata Legislation

17 Feb 2026: Paige Estritori

The Insurance Council of Australia (ICA) has called for significant reforms to Victoria's strata legislation, highlighting that poor governance and deferred maintenance are leading to increased insurance premiums for the one in five Victorians residing in strata-titled properties. In a submission to the Expert Panel Review of the Owners Corporations Act 2006, the ICA emphasized that building defects are costing Australians an estimated $1. - read more

Click for more Insurance News