AFCA Upholds Insurer’s Decision in Breast Cancer Claim Case

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The woman was diagnosed with cancer in her right breast on October 5 of last year, followed by the discovery of cancer in her left breast eight days later. She filed claims under her critical illness policy that she had obtained on July 17.

However, TAL Life, her insurance provider, rejected the claims based on the policy's three-month qualifying period for cancer coverage.

In its ruling, AFCA noted that the policy had provisions to potentially waive the qualifying period if the policyholder could prove they were insured either under a previous TAL policy or by another insurer for the same events, right before their new coverage commenced.

The claimant contended that she had cancer coverage through an insurance policy provided by her husband's employer. She presented a letter from the employer affirming that she was covered under a "life, accident, critical illness, and medical insurance" scheme from August 2020 until June last year. Additionally, she showed documentation indicating her husband’s policy did include critical illness coverage for spouses, encompassing cancer.

While AFCA accepted the availability of this cancer coverage, it was not convinced that she held such coverage "immediately before the current policy began." It also noted she had failed to disclose her previous insurance when applying for the new policy with TAL Life.

"There is no information before me about the extent of the critical illness cover the complainant had, if any, through her husband's employer’s insurance arrangements," AFCA’s ombudsman stated.

"Furthermore, it appears that any cover she might have had ceased about a month before the new policy started. I am not convinced there was 'continuity of cover' as suggested by the complainant."

The ombudsman expressed AFCA’s sympathy towards the claimant, especially given that the diagnoses occurred "very close to the end of the qualifying period." Nonetheless, he emphasized that there was no valid reason for the qualifying period to be dismissed.

"The qualifying period is reasonably short and its existence is not unjust. These terms are part of all insurance policies and they draw necessary boundaries. The enforcement of these terms is not inherently unfair," the ombudsman elaborated.

For a more detailed account of the ruling, refer to the original report by AFCA.

Published:Wednesday, 4th Sep 2024
Author: Paige Estritori
Sources

Please Note: If this information affects you, seek advice from a licensed professional.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

NSW Strata Reforms Strengthen Maintenance Compliance Enforcement

19 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori

The New South Wales (NSW) government has introduced a new tranche of strata reforms aimed at enhancing the maintenance and safety of apartment buildings across the state. A key component of these reforms is the proposal to grant NSW Fair Trading the authority to enter any apartment building without a warrant if there are reasonable grounds to believe that the owners corporation is failing to maintain common property adequately. - read more

CHU's 2025 Report Shows Stability in Strata Insurance Premiums Amid Climate and Regulatory Shifts

19 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori

CHU, Australia's leading strata insurance underwriting agency, has released its 2025 State of the Strata Market report, providing a comprehensive analysis of the current state of the industry. The report offers valuable insights into premium movements, the impact of weather events, regulatory developments, and emerging risks affecting strata insurance. - read more

CHU Enhances Strata Insurance Capacity for Larger Developments

19 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori

In response to the evolving landscape of strata developments in Australia, CHU, the nation's leading strata insurance underwriting agency, has significantly increased its capacity to underwrite individual strata risks. The agency has raised its maximum single risk capacity to $690 million, a substantial rise from the previous limit of $300 million. This enhancement applies to CHU's strata insurance policies across both residential and commercial properties. - read more

Significant Rise in Australian Home Insurance Premiums

19 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori

Australian homeowners are facing substantial increases in home insurance premiums, with the average premium rising by 16% over the past year, according to a recent report by consumer advocacy group Choice. Notably, insurers such as Kogan, RAC, and Honey have implemented hikes exceeding 30%, placing additional financial strain on policyholders. - read more

APRA Highlights Evolving Trends in Australian Insurance Sectors

19 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori

The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has released its quarterly aggregate statistics for the insurance sector, covering the period ending September 30, 2025. The data reveals notable shifts across general insurance, life insurance, and private health insurance sectors, reflecting the dynamic nature of the Australian insurance landscape. - read more

Click for more Insurance News