Insurance Claim Rejected After Flight Crew Timing Violation

3

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The frustrated passenger incurred additional costs when his flight from Palermo to London was unexpectedly stopped because the crew had worked the maximum hours allowed by law. He expected full coverage for these expenses under his travel insurance policy.

However, Lloyd’s Australia, the insurer, denied the claim, stating that the travel policy’s clause on additional expenses and disruption coverage only applies to events such as strikes, riots, hijacks, civil unrest, adverse weather conditions, or accidents involving the mode of transport.

The claimant argued otherwise, insisting that the crew reaching its working hours limit was akin to industrial action such as strikes, implying that the insurer had a too narrow interpretation of the policy's disruption cover. He stated that the restriction on working hours is a precaution to prevent accidents, which aligns with the "spirit of the policy".

Yet, The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) did not accept this reasoning.

AFCA pointed out the scant information provided by the claimant which linked the flight cancellation directly to crew working hours being exceeded. They reinforced that this situation is distinct from a strike.

“A strike constitutes a deliberate refusal to work, whereas regulatory limits on work hours are a constraint and not a chosen action,” noted the AFCA's ombudsman. “Additionally, equating flight crew timing regulations with an accident scenario is not fitting, since the clause in question applies to actual incidents happening, not cancellations meant to forestall potential accidents.”

However, AFCA acknowledged a part of the travel policy which offers coverage for scenarios where a flight is delayed over six hours due to uncontrollable circumstances.

Under this provision, the insurer is required to compensate the complainant with the policy’s cap of $2000.

“Although the insurer claims that these circumstances are specifically excluded by the policy, they failed to indicate which exclusion they are relying on and provide justification for triggering it. Therefore, it is unconvincing that the insurer has adequately clarified its entitlement to decline or reduce the claim under this section,” AFCA concluded.

This case was originally reported by Insurance News Australia.

Published:Monday, 9th Sep 2024
Source: Paige Estritori

Please Note: If this information affects you, seek advice from a licensed professional.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

CHU Enhances Strata Insurance Capacity for Larger Developments

21 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori

CHU, Australia's leading strata insurance underwriting agency, has significantly increased its capacity to underwrite individual strata risks, now offering coverage up to $690 million. This substantial rise from the previous limit of $300 million is a strategic response to the evolving landscape of strata developments, which are becoming larger and more complex. - read more

ICA Advocates for Strata Law Reforms to Mitigate Rising Insurance Costs in Victoria

21 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori

The Insurance Council of Australia (ICA) has called for significant reforms to Victoria's strata legislation, citing a direct link between inadequate governance and escalating insurance premiums for residents. With approximately one in five Victorians living in strata-titled properties, the need for effective management and oversight has become increasingly critical. - read more

Significant Reductions in Australian Construction Insurance Premiums

20 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori

The Australian construction insurance market has experienced a notable shift in 2025, with premiums decreasing across various lines due to intensified competition among insurers. According to Marsh's Construction Insurance Market Update 2025, the first half of the year saw average premium reductions ranging from 5% to 15%, marking a significant departure from the upward trend observed in 2024. - read more

Elevated Construction Costs Prompt Reassessment of Insurance Strategies

20 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori

Australia's construction sector continues to grapple with elevated cost pressures, prompting builders to reassess their insurance and risk management strategies. Gallagher reports that overall construction costs have increased by over 30%, influenced by supply chain disruptions, inflation, and labour shortages. - read more

South Australia Strengthens Homeowner Insurance Amid Rising Builder Insolvencies

20 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori

The South Australian Government has taken decisive action to bolster homeowner protection in response to a surge in builder insolvencies. Effective from 1 October 2025, the maximum insurance payout for homeowners will increase from $150,000 to $250,000. This measure aims to provide greater financial security to homeowners left with incomplete or defective properties due to builder failures. - read more

Click for more Insurance News