Insurance Claim Rejected After Flight Crew Timing Violation

3

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The frustrated passenger incurred additional costs when his flight from Palermo to London was unexpectedly stopped because the crew had worked the maximum hours allowed by law. He expected full coverage for these expenses under his travel insurance policy.

However, Lloyd’s Australia, the insurer, denied the claim, stating that the travel policy’s clause on additional expenses and disruption coverage only applies to events such as strikes, riots, hijacks, civil unrest, adverse weather conditions, or accidents involving the mode of transport.

The claimant argued otherwise, insisting that the crew reaching its working hours limit was akin to industrial action such as strikes, implying that the insurer had a too narrow interpretation of the policy's disruption cover. He stated that the restriction on working hours is a precaution to prevent accidents, which aligns with the "spirit of the policy".

Yet, The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) did not accept this reasoning.

AFCA pointed out the scant information provided by the claimant which linked the flight cancellation directly to crew working hours being exceeded. They reinforced that this situation is distinct from a strike.

“A strike constitutes a deliberate refusal to work, whereas regulatory limits on work hours are a constraint and not a chosen action,” noted the AFCA's ombudsman. “Additionally, equating flight crew timing regulations with an accident scenario is not fitting, since the clause in question applies to actual incidents happening, not cancellations meant to forestall potential accidents.”

However, AFCA acknowledged a part of the travel policy which offers coverage for scenarios where a flight is delayed over six hours due to uncontrollable circumstances.

Under this provision, the insurer is required to compensate the complainant with the policy’s cap of $2000.

“Although the insurer claims that these circumstances are specifically excluded by the policy, they failed to indicate which exclusion they are relying on and provide justification for triggering it. Therefore, it is unconvincing that the insurer has adequately clarified its entitlement to decline or reduce the claim under this section,” AFCA concluded.

This case was originally reported by Insurance News Australia.

Published:Monday, 9th Sep 2024
Source: Paige Estritori

Please Note: If this information affects you, seek advice from a licensed professional.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

Rising Insurance Premiums Challenge Australian SMEs

29 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori

Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) across Australia are increasingly burdened by soaring insurance premiums, with many facing hikes of 30% or more within a single year. This surge has led some businesses to either reduce their coverage or forgo insurance altogether, exposing them to significant financial risks. - read more

Upcover's New Management Liability Insurance for SMEs

29 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori

Australian insurtech company Upcover has unveiled a new management liability insurance product designed specifically for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and sole traders. This offering aims to provide comprehensive protection against a range of risks that business owners may encounter. - read more

QBE Strengthens Cyber Insurance Offerings

29 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori

In response to the growing prevalence of cyber threats and increasingly stringent regulations, QBE Insurance has announced a strategic initiative to bolster its cyber insurance capabilities. This move aims to provide brokers and their clients with more robust support in navigating the complex landscape of cyber risks. - read more

Australian Insurers Report $1.11 Billion Profit in Q1 2025

29 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori

The Australian insurance industry has reported a net profit after tax of $1.11 billion for the first quarter of 2025, according to the latest data from the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA). This figure includes contributions of $990 million from insurers and $123 million from reinsurers. The insurance service result, a key measure of underwriting performance, stood at $1.32 billion for the quarter, complemented by investment returns totaling $1.18 billion. - read more

Australian General Insurance Premiums Set to Surpass $144 Billion by 2029

29 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori

The Australian general insurance industry is on a trajectory to see direct written premiums (DWP) exceed $144 billion by 2029, according to projections from data and analytics firm GlobalData. This anticipated growth is attributed to several key factors, including an increased demand for coverage and a rise in the frequency of natural disasters. - read more

Click for more Insurance News