Insurance Claim Rejected After Flight Crew Timing Violation

3

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The frustrated passenger incurred additional costs when his flight from Palermo to London was unexpectedly stopped because the crew had worked the maximum hours allowed by law. He expected full coverage for these expenses under his travel insurance policy.

However, Lloyd’s Australia, the insurer, denied the claim, stating that the travel policy’s clause on additional expenses and disruption coverage only applies to events such as strikes, riots, hijacks, civil unrest, adverse weather conditions, or accidents involving the mode of transport.

The claimant argued otherwise, insisting that the crew reaching its working hours limit was akin to industrial action such as strikes, implying that the insurer had a too narrow interpretation of the policy's disruption cover. He stated that the restriction on working hours is a precaution to prevent accidents, which aligns with the "spirit of the policy".

Yet, The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) did not accept this reasoning.

AFCA pointed out the scant information provided by the claimant which linked the flight cancellation directly to crew working hours being exceeded. They reinforced that this situation is distinct from a strike.

“A strike constitutes a deliberate refusal to work, whereas regulatory limits on work hours are a constraint and not a chosen action,” noted the AFCA's ombudsman. “Additionally, equating flight crew timing regulations with an accident scenario is not fitting, since the clause in question applies to actual incidents happening, not cancellations meant to forestall potential accidents.”

However, AFCA acknowledged a part of the travel policy which offers coverage for scenarios where a flight is delayed over six hours due to uncontrollable circumstances.

Under this provision, the insurer is required to compensate the complainant with the policy’s cap of $2000.

“Although the insurer claims that these circumstances are specifically excluded by the policy, they failed to indicate which exclusion they are relying on and provide justification for triggering it. Therefore, it is unconvincing that the insurer has adequately clarified its entitlement to decline or reduce the claim under this section,” AFCA concluded.

This case was originally reported by Insurance News Australia.

Published:Monday, 9th Sep 2024
Source: Paige Estritori

Please Note: If this information affects you, seek advice from a licensed professional.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

Rural Affinity and Munich Re Strengthen Agricultural Insurance in Australia

09 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori

In a significant development for Australia's agricultural sector, Rural Affinity has renewed its partnership with Munich Re Specialty - Global Markets under a new five-year agreement. This collaboration, which began in 2006, is set to enhance the availability and scope of agricultural insurance products across the country. - read more

WFI Insurance Highlights Significant Drop in Farm Liability Claims

09 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori

WFI Insurance has reported a notable decrease in farm liability claims across most categories, signaling a positive trend in safety practices within the Australian agricultural sector. The insurer observed a 75% reduction in falls from height over the past year, alongside a 30% decline in impact injuries, marking the lowest level in four years. - read more

Elders Insurance Highlights Increased Summer Storm Risks for Farmers

09 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori

Elders Insurance is urging Australian farmers to prepare for another damaging summer, with claims data revealing the scale and financial impact of storm activity across the country's agricultural regions. Analysis of storm-related farm insurance property claims over the last two years indicates that summer accounts for the highest number of claims nationally. - read more

Insuregroup Achieves Significant Milestone in Truck Insurance Policies

09 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori

Insuregroup, a specialist insurance brokerage serving Australia's transport and logistics sector, has recently achieved a significant milestone by processing over 10,000 insurance policies since its inception. This accomplishment includes a 25% year-on-year increase in policy count, highlighting the escalating demand for comprehensive truck insurance solutions among Australian freight operators. - read more

Queensland Aligns with National Heavy Vehicle Regulator

09 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori

In a significant move towards regulatory consistency, Queensland has transferred its heavy vehicle compliance responsibilities to the National Heavy Vehicle Regulator (NHVR). This transition aligns Queensland with New South Wales, Victoria, South Australia, Tasmania, and the Australian Capital Territory, all of which have already integrated their heavy vehicle regulations under the NHVR's oversight. - read more

Click for more Insurance News