Insurance Claim Rejected After Flight Crew Timing Violation

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The frustrated passenger incurred additional costs when his flight from Palermo to London was unexpectedly stopped because the crew had worked the maximum hours allowed by law. He expected full coverage for these expenses under his travel insurance policy.

However, Lloyd’s Australia, the insurer, denied the claim, stating that the travel policy’s clause on additional expenses and disruption coverage only applies to events such as strikes, riots, hijacks, civil unrest, adverse weather conditions, or accidents involving the mode of transport.

The claimant argued otherwise, insisting that the crew reaching its working hours limit was akin to industrial action such as strikes, implying that the insurer had a too narrow interpretation of the policy's disruption cover. He stated that the restriction on working hours is a precaution to prevent accidents, which aligns with the "spirit of the policy".

Yet, The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) did not accept this reasoning.

AFCA pointed out the scant information provided by the claimant which linked the flight cancellation directly to crew working hours being exceeded. They reinforced that this situation is distinct from a strike.

“A strike constitutes a deliberate refusal to work, whereas regulatory limits on work hours are a constraint and not a chosen action,” noted the AFCA's ombudsman. “Additionally, equating flight crew timing regulations with an accident scenario is not fitting, since the clause in question applies to actual incidents happening, not cancellations meant to forestall potential accidents.”

However, AFCA acknowledged a part of the travel policy which offers coverage for scenarios where a flight is delayed over six hours due to uncontrollable circumstances.

Under this provision, the insurer is required to compensate the complainant with the policy’s cap of $2000.

“Although the insurer claims that these circumstances are specifically excluded by the policy, they failed to indicate which exclusion they are relying on and provide justification for triggering it. Therefore, it is unconvincing that the insurer has adequately clarified its entitlement to decline or reduce the claim under this section,” AFCA concluded.

This case was originally reported by Insurance News Australia.

Published:Monday, 9th Sep 2024
Author: Paige Estritori

Please Note: If this information affects you, seek advice from a licensed professional.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

Upcoming NDIS Planning Reforms and Their Impact on Allied Health Services

26 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori

The National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) in Australia is undergoing significant planning reforms scheduled to commence in July 2026. These changes are poised to have a profound impact on allied health services, necessitating proactive engagement from healthcare professionals and stakeholders. - read more

Australian Private Health Insurance Premiums Set to Increase in 2026

26 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori

From April 1, 2026, Australian private health insurance premiums are set to rise by an average of 4.41%, marking the most significant increase since 2017. This adjustment reflects the escalating costs associated with providing medical and hospital services, which have risen by 5% over the past financial year. - read more

Artificial Intelligence Transforming Allied Health Services in Australia

26 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori

The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into allied health services across Australia is significantly enhancing patient care and streamlining clinical operations. This technological advancement is reshaping the healthcare landscape, offering innovative solutions to longstanding challenges. - read more

AUSactive's New Insurance Offering: Enhanced Protection at Lower Costs

26 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori

AUSactive, Australia's leading body for the exercise and active health sector, has unveiled a new insurance solution designed specifically for fitness and active health professionals. This initiative aims to provide enhanced protection while offering lower premiums compared to existing market options. - read more

Private Health Insurers Advocate for Reforms Amid Rising Specialist Fees

26 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori

Private health insurers in Australia are raising concerns over the increasing fees charged by medical specialists, which are leading to higher out-of-pocket expenses for patients and causing some to delay or cancel necessary care. A recent report by Private Healthcare Australia highlights that more than half of the surveyed patients received medical bills larger than expected, with specialist fees for in-hospital care rising by 22% over the past three years. - read more

Click for more Insurance News