Insurance Claim Rejected After Flight Crew Timing Violation

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The frustrated passenger incurred additional costs when his flight from Palermo to London was unexpectedly stopped because the crew had worked the maximum hours allowed by law. He expected full coverage for these expenses under his travel insurance policy.

However, Lloyd’s Australia, the insurer, denied the claim, stating that the travel policy’s clause on additional expenses and disruption coverage only applies to events such as strikes, riots, hijacks, civil unrest, adverse weather conditions, or accidents involving the mode of transport.

The claimant argued otherwise, insisting that the crew reaching its working hours limit was akin to industrial action such as strikes, implying that the insurer had a too narrow interpretation of the policy's disruption cover. He stated that the restriction on working hours is a precaution to prevent accidents, which aligns with the "spirit of the policy".

Yet, The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) did not accept this reasoning.

AFCA pointed out the scant information provided by the claimant which linked the flight cancellation directly to crew working hours being exceeded. They reinforced that this situation is distinct from a strike.

“A strike constitutes a deliberate refusal to work, whereas regulatory limits on work hours are a constraint and not a chosen action,” noted the AFCA's ombudsman. “Additionally, equating flight crew timing regulations with an accident scenario is not fitting, since the clause in question applies to actual incidents happening, not cancellations meant to forestall potential accidents.”

However, AFCA acknowledged a part of the travel policy which offers coverage for scenarios where a flight is delayed over six hours due to uncontrollable circumstances.

Under this provision, the insurer is required to compensate the complainant with the policy’s cap of $2000.

“Although the insurer claims that these circumstances are specifically excluded by the policy, they failed to indicate which exclusion they are relying on and provide justification for triggering it. Therefore, it is unconvincing that the insurer has adequately clarified its entitlement to decline or reduce the claim under this section,” AFCA concluded.

This case was originally reported by Insurance News Australia.

Published:Monday, 9th Sep 2024
Author: Paige Estritori

Please Note: If this information affects you, seek advice from a licensed professional.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

AIA Australia's Latest Enhancements to Priority Protection Insurance

24 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori

AIA Australia has recently updated its Priority Protection life insurance suite, introducing changes designed to simplify discounts, enhance policy clarity, and support premium affordability. These enhancements, effective from 9 November 2025, reflect AIA's commitment to providing value-driven solutions for policyholders. - read more

Australia's Life Insurance Coverage Falls Short of Global Standards

24 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori

Recent findings from a survey conducted by Zurich and the University of Oxford reveal that Australia has one of the lowest life insurance penetration rates globally. The study indicates that only 27% of Australians have income protection insurance, and 25% possess life insurance coverage. These figures are notably lower than the global averages of 33% for income protection and 32% for life insurance. - read more

Zurich's Pioneering Women's Health Benefit in Income Protection

24 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori

Zurich has introduced a groundbreaking Women's Health Benefit within its Corporate Care Income Protection product, marking the first dedicated corporate income protection benefit in Australia designed specifically for female health conditions and events. This initiative aims to provide targeted support for women experiencing health issues that can impact their professional lives. - read more

Club Marine Introduces Land-Based Insurance for Race Boats

24 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori

Club Marine, Australia's leading boat insurance provider, has announced a new partnership with the Australian Offshore Powerboat Club (AOPC) to offer specialised insurance coverage for race boats while they are on land. This initiative addresses a significant gap in the market, providing protection against accidental loss, damage, theft, or malicious damage to vessels during storage and transit. - read more

Significant Decline in Australian Commercial Insurance Rates

24 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori

Recent data from global insurance broker Marsh indicates a notable decline in commercial insurance rates across the Pacific region, with a 12% drop recorded in the last quarter of 2025. This marks the steepest decrease since early 2024, suggesting a softening market and increased competition among insurers. - read more

Click for more Insurance News