Insurance Claim Rejected After Flight Crew Timing Violation

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The frustrated passenger incurred additional costs when his flight from Palermo to London was unexpectedly stopped because the crew had worked the maximum hours allowed by law. He expected full coverage for these expenses under his travel insurance policy.

However, Lloyd’s Australia, the insurer, denied the claim, stating that the travel policy’s clause on additional expenses and disruption coverage only applies to events such as strikes, riots, hijacks, civil unrest, adverse weather conditions, or accidents involving the mode of transport.

The claimant argued otherwise, insisting that the crew reaching its working hours limit was akin to industrial action such as strikes, implying that the insurer had a too narrow interpretation of the policy's disruption cover. He stated that the restriction on working hours is a precaution to prevent accidents, which aligns with the "spirit of the policy".

Yet, The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) did not accept this reasoning.

AFCA pointed out the scant information provided by the claimant which linked the flight cancellation directly to crew working hours being exceeded. They reinforced that this situation is distinct from a strike.

“A strike constitutes a deliberate refusal to work, whereas regulatory limits on work hours are a constraint and not a chosen action,” noted the AFCA's ombudsman. “Additionally, equating flight crew timing regulations with an accident scenario is not fitting, since the clause in question applies to actual incidents happening, not cancellations meant to forestall potential accidents.”

However, AFCA acknowledged a part of the travel policy which offers coverage for scenarios where a flight is delayed over six hours due to uncontrollable circumstances.

Under this provision, the insurer is required to compensate the complainant with the policy’s cap of $2000.

“Although the insurer claims that these circumstances are specifically excluded by the policy, they failed to indicate which exclusion they are relying on and provide justification for triggering it. Therefore, it is unconvincing that the insurer has adequately clarified its entitlement to decline or reduce the claim under this section,” AFCA concluded.

This case was originally reported by Insurance News Australia.

Published:Monday, 9th Sep 2024
Source: Paige Estritori

Please Note: If this information affects you, seek advice from a licensed professional.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

WA Transport Sector Pushes for Enhanced Truck Licensing Standards

05 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori

Western Australia's transport industry is urging the state government to implement more stringent heavy vehicle licensing requirements, aiming to bolster road safety and address concerns over inexperienced drivers operating large trucks. This initiative follows South Australia's recent reforms, which introduced tougher conditions for obtaining multi-combination (MC) licenses. - read more

Heightened Road Risks as Holiday Travel Meets Freight Surge

05 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori

As the Australian summer holidays approach, a significant increase in road traffic is anticipated, coinciding with peak freight activity. This convergence raises concerns about heightened road risks, prompting insurers and transport specialists to issue warnings to motorists. - read more

Federal Court Denies Truck Driver's Insurance Appeal

05 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori

In a recent legal development, the Federal Court of Australia dismissed an appeal by Bradley Henschke, a logging truck driver, concerning his insurance claim against the Australian Retirement Trust. The court's decision, delivered on February 12, 2026, underscores the critical importance of active insurance coverage for workers in high-risk occupations. - read more

Navigating Rising Premiums and Cybersecurity Threats in Australia's Insurance Sector

05 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori

In 2026, Australia's insurance industry is grappling with significant challenges, notably escalating premiums and increasing cybersecurity threats. These issues have prompted insurers to reassess their strategies to maintain profitability and customer trust. - read more

Bridging the Risk Preparedness Gap: Australian Insurers and Emerging Threats

05 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori

Recent findings from PwC's Insurance Banana Skins Survey reveal that Australian insurers are falling behind their global counterparts in risk preparedness, particularly concerning emerging threats such as artificial intelligence (AI) and cyber risks. The survey indicates that local insurers scored 6.6% lower on the Preparedness Index compared to global peers, marking a four-year low. - read more

Click for more Insurance News