Insurance Claim Rejected After Flight Crew Timing Violation

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The frustrated passenger incurred additional costs when his flight from Palermo to London was unexpectedly stopped because the crew had worked the maximum hours allowed by law. He expected full coverage for these expenses under his travel insurance policy.

However, Lloyd’s Australia, the insurer, denied the claim, stating that the travel policy’s clause on additional expenses and disruption coverage only applies to events such as strikes, riots, hijacks, civil unrest, adverse weather conditions, or accidents involving the mode of transport.

The claimant argued otherwise, insisting that the crew reaching its working hours limit was akin to industrial action such as strikes, implying that the insurer had a too narrow interpretation of the policy's disruption cover. He stated that the restriction on working hours is a precaution to prevent accidents, which aligns with the "spirit of the policy".

Yet, The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) did not accept this reasoning.

AFCA pointed out the scant information provided by the claimant which linked the flight cancellation directly to crew working hours being exceeded. They reinforced that this situation is distinct from a strike.

“A strike constitutes a deliberate refusal to work, whereas regulatory limits on work hours are a constraint and not a chosen action,” noted the AFCA's ombudsman. “Additionally, equating flight crew timing regulations with an accident scenario is not fitting, since the clause in question applies to actual incidents happening, not cancellations meant to forestall potential accidents.”

However, AFCA acknowledged a part of the travel policy which offers coverage for scenarios where a flight is delayed over six hours due to uncontrollable circumstances.

Under this provision, the insurer is required to compensate the complainant with the policy’s cap of $2000.

“Although the insurer claims that these circumstances are specifically excluded by the policy, they failed to indicate which exclusion they are relying on and provide justification for triggering it. Therefore, it is unconvincing that the insurer has adequately clarified its entitlement to decline or reduce the claim under this section,” AFCA concluded.

This case was originally reported by Insurance News Australia.

Published:Monday, 9th Sep 2024
Author: Paige Estritori

Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

Broker Held Accountable for Uncommunicated Policy Exclusions Leading to Claim Denial

10 Apr 2026: Paige Estritori

In a recent decision by the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA), a broker has been found liable for failing to adequately inform a client about critical exclusions in a truck insurance policy, resulting in the denial of a damage claim. This case underscores the paramount importance of clear communication between brokers and clients, especially concerning policy terms that can significantly impact coverage. - read more

Understanding the Impact of Seasonal Risks on Truck Insurance in Australia

10 Apr 2026: Paige Estritori

Seasonal changes in Australia bring about varying weather patterns and traffic conditions, significantly impacting the trucking industry. These fluctuations not only affect operational efficiency but also have profound implications for insurance coverage and premiums. Understanding these seasonal risks is crucial for truck owners and operators to ensure adequate protection and cost management. - read more

Navigating Insurance Requirements for Food Truck Operators in Australia

10 Apr 2026: Paige Estritori

Operating a food truck in Australia presents unique challenges, particularly when it comes to securing appropriate insurance coverage. Unlike traditional brick-and-mortar establishments, food trucks combine elements of a business, vehicle, and commercial kitchen, necessitating a tailored approach to insurance. - read more

Zurich Australia's New Income Protection for Women's Health

09 Apr 2026: Paige Estritori

Zurich Australia has unveiled a pioneering income protection benefit tailored specifically for women's health conditions, including menopause and endometriosis. This initiative addresses the significant impact these conditions have on women's professional lives and financial stability. - read more

APRA's Renewed Efforts to Reform Income Protection Insurance

09 Apr 2026: Paige Estritori

The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has announced the resumption of its reforms targeting individual disability income insurance (IDII), commonly known as income protection insurance. This initiative aims to address the financial challenges that have plagued the industry, with insurers reporting losses exceeding $3.4 billion over the past five years. - read more

Click for more Insurance News