Insurance Claim Rejected After Flight Crew Timing Violation

3

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The frustrated passenger incurred additional costs when his flight from Palermo to London was unexpectedly stopped because the crew had worked the maximum hours allowed by law. He expected full coverage for these expenses under his travel insurance policy.

However, Lloyd’s Australia, the insurer, denied the claim, stating that the travel policy’s clause on additional expenses and disruption coverage only applies to events such as strikes, riots, hijacks, civil unrest, adverse weather conditions, or accidents involving the mode of transport.

The claimant argued otherwise, insisting that the crew reaching its working hours limit was akin to industrial action such as strikes, implying that the insurer had a too narrow interpretation of the policy's disruption cover. He stated that the restriction on working hours is a precaution to prevent accidents, which aligns with the "spirit of the policy".

Yet, The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) did not accept this reasoning.

AFCA pointed out the scant information provided by the claimant which linked the flight cancellation directly to crew working hours being exceeded. They reinforced that this situation is distinct from a strike.

“A strike constitutes a deliberate refusal to work, whereas regulatory limits on work hours are a constraint and not a chosen action,” noted the AFCA's ombudsman. “Additionally, equating flight crew timing regulations with an accident scenario is not fitting, since the clause in question applies to actual incidents happening, not cancellations meant to forestall potential accidents.”

However, AFCA acknowledged a part of the travel policy which offers coverage for scenarios where a flight is delayed over six hours due to uncontrollable circumstances.

Under this provision, the insurer is required to compensate the complainant with the policy’s cap of $2000.

“Although the insurer claims that these circumstances are specifically excluded by the policy, they failed to indicate which exclusion they are relying on and provide justification for triggering it. Therefore, it is unconvincing that the insurer has adequately clarified its entitlement to decline or reduce the claim under this section,” AFCA concluded.

This case was originally reported by Insurance News Australia.

Published:Monday, 9th Sep 2024
Source: Paige Estritori

Please Note: If this information affects you, seek advice from a licensed professional.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

TAL's Health Sense Plus Now Covers Income Protection Policies

11 Feb 2026: Paige Estritori

In a strategic move to make life insurance more relevant to younger Australians, TAL has expanded its Health Sense Plus program to encompass income protection policies. This initiative allows advisers to offer clients enhanced value through a straightforward preventative health engagement. - read more

AFCA's Ruling: Home-Based Waxing Salon Deemed a Business

11 Feb 2026: Paige Estritori

The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) recently ruled that a home-based waxing salon constitutes a business, not merely a hobby. This decision has significant implications for beauticians managing home-based operations, particularly concerning insurance disclosures and compliance. - read more

Insurers Push for Overhaul of Civil Liability Laws Amid Rising Premiums

11 Feb 2026: Paige Estritori

The Insurance Council of Australia (ICA) has recently called for comprehensive reforms to state and territory civil liability laws, citing significant increases in public liability insurance premiums. This development is particularly relevant for beauticians and small business owners in the beauty industry, who are experiencing escalating insurance costs. - read more

Cosmetic Injectables Industry Booms Amid Safety Concerns

11 Feb 2026: Paige Estritori

The cosmetic injectables industry in Australia has experienced significant growth, with the market valued at $4.1 billion in 2023 and projected to grow by 19.3% annually until 2030. This surge reflects increasing consumer demand for non-surgical cosmetic procedures, including anti-wrinkle injections and dermal fillers. - read more

Escalating Insurance Costs Pose Challenges for Small Builders

11 Feb 2026: Paige Estritori

Recent findings from the Housing Industry Association (HIA) reveal that a significant majority of small and medium-sized builders in Australia are grappling with the escalating costs of insurance premiums. In a comprehensive survey, 72% of respondents identified rising insurance expenses as the primary pressure point affecting their businesses. This concern surpasses other operational challenges such as planning approvals, skilled labour shortages, and compliance with building codes. - read more

Click for more Insurance News