Insurance Claim Rejected After Flight Crew Timing Violation

3

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The frustrated passenger incurred additional costs when his flight from Palermo to London was unexpectedly stopped because the crew had worked the maximum hours allowed by law. He expected full coverage for these expenses under his travel insurance policy.

However, Lloyd’s Australia, the insurer, denied the claim, stating that the travel policy’s clause on additional expenses and disruption coverage only applies to events such as strikes, riots, hijacks, civil unrest, adverse weather conditions, or accidents involving the mode of transport.

The claimant argued otherwise, insisting that the crew reaching its working hours limit was akin to industrial action such as strikes, implying that the insurer had a too narrow interpretation of the policy's disruption cover. He stated that the restriction on working hours is a precaution to prevent accidents, which aligns with the "spirit of the policy".

Yet, The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) did not accept this reasoning.

AFCA pointed out the scant information provided by the claimant which linked the flight cancellation directly to crew working hours being exceeded. They reinforced that this situation is distinct from a strike.

“A strike constitutes a deliberate refusal to work, whereas regulatory limits on work hours are a constraint and not a chosen action,” noted the AFCA's ombudsman. “Additionally, equating flight crew timing regulations with an accident scenario is not fitting, since the clause in question applies to actual incidents happening, not cancellations meant to forestall potential accidents.”

However, AFCA acknowledged a part of the travel policy which offers coverage for scenarios where a flight is delayed over six hours due to uncontrollable circumstances.

Under this provision, the insurer is required to compensate the complainant with the policy’s cap of $2000.

“Although the insurer claims that these circumstances are specifically excluded by the policy, they failed to indicate which exclusion they are relying on and provide justification for triggering it. Therefore, it is unconvincing that the insurer has adequately clarified its entitlement to decline or reduce the claim under this section,” AFCA concluded.

This case was originally reported by Insurance News Australia.

Published:Monday, 9th Sep 2024
Source: Paige Estritori

Please Note: If this information affects you, seek advice from a licensed professional.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

Australian Life Insurance Premiums Set for 1.7% Growth in 2025

18 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori

According to a recent report by Swiss Re, Australia's life insurance market is projected to experience a 1.7% real growth in premiums in 2025. This anticipated increase is attributed to easing cost-of-living pressures and the repricing of disability income policies. - read more

TAL's Health Sense Plus Now Covers Income Protection Policies

18 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori

In a significant development for policyholders, TAL has expanded its Health Sense Plus program to encompass income protection (IP) policies. This initiative, effective from August 8, 2025, aims to incentivize proactive health management by offering premium discounts to clients who engage in preventive health checks. - read more

Pelagic Risk Services Strengthens Commitment to Marinas with Gold Sponsorship

18 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori

In a significant move to bolster support for the marina industry, Pelagic Risk Services has elevated its sponsorship status from Silver to Gold with the Marina Industries Association (MIA). This advancement underscores Pelagic's dedication to enhancing the operational capabilities and risk management strategies of marina operators across Australia. - read more

Australian Insurers Falling Behind in Cyber and AI Risk Readiness

18 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori

In an era where digital threats are escalating, Australian insurers are reportedly less prepared to manage risks associated with cyber threats and artificial intelligence (AI) compared to their global counterparts. This insight emerges from the latest PwC Insurance Banana Skins Survey, which assesses the industry's readiness to tackle emerging challenges. - read more

Australian Insurance Market Set for Significant Growth by 2029

18 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori

Australia's general insurance market is on a trajectory of steady expansion, with projections indicating that total direct written premiums (DWP) will reach $144.5 billion by 2029. This growth reflects a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 8.8%, as analysed by data and analytics firm GlobalData. - read more

Click for more Insurance News