Insurance Claim Rejected After Flight Crew Timing Violation

3

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The frustrated passenger incurred additional costs when his flight from Palermo to London was unexpectedly stopped because the crew had worked the maximum hours allowed by law. He expected full coverage for these expenses under his travel insurance policy.

However, Lloyd’s Australia, the insurer, denied the claim, stating that the travel policy’s clause on additional expenses and disruption coverage only applies to events such as strikes, riots, hijacks, civil unrest, adverse weather conditions, or accidents involving the mode of transport.

The claimant argued otherwise, insisting that the crew reaching its working hours limit was akin to industrial action such as strikes, implying that the insurer had a too narrow interpretation of the policy's disruption cover. He stated that the restriction on working hours is a precaution to prevent accidents, which aligns with the "spirit of the policy".

Yet, The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) did not accept this reasoning.

AFCA pointed out the scant information provided by the claimant which linked the flight cancellation directly to crew working hours being exceeded. They reinforced that this situation is distinct from a strike.

“A strike constitutes a deliberate refusal to work, whereas regulatory limits on work hours are a constraint and not a chosen action,” noted the AFCA's ombudsman. “Additionally, equating flight crew timing regulations with an accident scenario is not fitting, since the clause in question applies to actual incidents happening, not cancellations meant to forestall potential accidents.”

However, AFCA acknowledged a part of the travel policy which offers coverage for scenarios where a flight is delayed over six hours due to uncontrollable circumstances.

Under this provision, the insurer is required to compensate the complainant with the policy’s cap of $2000.

“Although the insurer claims that these circumstances are specifically excluded by the policy, they failed to indicate which exclusion they are relying on and provide justification for triggering it. Therefore, it is unconvincing that the insurer has adequately clarified its entitlement to decline or reduce the claim under this section,” AFCA concluded.

This case was originally reported by Insurance News Australia.

Published:Monday, 9th Sep 2024
Source: Paige Estritori

Please Note: If this information affects you, seek advice from a licensed professional.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

Medical Emergencies Lead Australian Travel Insurance Claims in 2024

28 Nov 2025: Paige Estritori

In 2024, medical incidents emerged as the leading cause of travel insurance claims among Australian travellers, accounting for more than 40% of all claims handled by nib Travel. This trend underscores the critical importance of securing comprehensive travel insurance to mitigate the financial risks associated with medical emergencies abroad. - read more

QBE Insurance Faces Market Challenges with Slower Premium Growth

28 Nov 2025: Paige Estritori

QBE Insurance Group, Australia's largest insurer by market value, recently reported a slowdown in premium rate growth, leading to a significant decline in its share price. The company's global average premium rate increased by only 1.5% in the nine months leading up to September 30, 2025, a decrease from the first-half pace. This deceleration is primarily attributed to slower growth in business property insurance prices. - read more

EQT's Bid to Acquire AUB Group: Implications for the Insurance Sector

28 Nov 2025: Paige Estritori

In a significant move within the Australian insurance industry, Swedish private equity firm EQT has extended a takeover offer for AUB Group, valuing the company at A$5.25 billion. This proposal includes a price of A$45 per share, representing a 25.1% premium over AUB's last closing price. Following the announcement, AUB shares surged up to 11% to A$39.95, though they remained below the offer price. - read more

Australian Insurers Report Record Profits Amid Market Dynamics

28 Nov 2025: Paige Estritori

Australia's general insurance industry has reported a return on equity (ROE) of 19% for the 2025 financial year, marking the highest in a decade. This impressive performance is attributed to a combination of factors, including benign weather conditions, strong investment gains, and the continued flow-through of premium increases. - read more

Seafood Distributor Prevails in Insurance Claim for Stock Losses Due to Power Outage

28 Nov 2025: Paige Estritori

In a recent ruling by the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA), a seafood distribution business has successfully claimed insurance for stock losses incurred during a week-long power outage. This case underscores the complexities surrounding insurance claims related to power failures and the importance of understanding policy exclusions. - read more

Click for more Insurance News