Insurance Claim Rejected After Flight Crew Timing Violation

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The frustrated passenger incurred additional costs when his flight from Palermo to London was unexpectedly stopped because the crew had worked the maximum hours allowed by law. He expected full coverage for these expenses under his travel insurance policy.

However, Lloyd’s Australia, the insurer, denied the claim, stating that the travel policy’s clause on additional expenses and disruption coverage only applies to events such as strikes, riots, hijacks, civil unrest, adverse weather conditions, or accidents involving the mode of transport.

The claimant argued otherwise, insisting that the crew reaching its working hours limit was akin to industrial action such as strikes, implying that the insurer had a too narrow interpretation of the policy's disruption cover. He stated that the restriction on working hours is a precaution to prevent accidents, which aligns with the "spirit of the policy".

Yet, The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) did not accept this reasoning.

AFCA pointed out the scant information provided by the claimant which linked the flight cancellation directly to crew working hours being exceeded. They reinforced that this situation is distinct from a strike.

“A strike constitutes a deliberate refusal to work, whereas regulatory limits on work hours are a constraint and not a chosen action,” noted the AFCA's ombudsman. “Additionally, equating flight crew timing regulations with an accident scenario is not fitting, since the clause in question applies to actual incidents happening, not cancellations meant to forestall potential accidents.”

However, AFCA acknowledged a part of the travel policy which offers coverage for scenarios where a flight is delayed over six hours due to uncontrollable circumstances.

Under this provision, the insurer is required to compensate the complainant with the policy’s cap of $2000.

“Although the insurer claims that these circumstances are specifically excluded by the policy, they failed to indicate which exclusion they are relying on and provide justification for triggering it. Therefore, it is unconvincing that the insurer has adequately clarified its entitlement to decline or reduce the claim under this section,” AFCA concluded.

This case was originally reported by Insurance News Australia.

Published:Monday, 9th Sep 2024
Author: Paige Estritori

Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

ACCC Flags Competition Concerns in IAG's Proposed Acquisition of RACWA

13 May 2026: Paige Estritori

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has raised significant concerns regarding Insurance Australia Group's (IAG) proposed acquisition of the Royal Automobile Club of Western Australia's (RACWA) insurance operations. This development has sparked a critical discussion about the future of competition within Western Australia's insurance sector. - read more

Markel Expands into Australian Market with Professional Indemnity Insurance

13 May 2026: Paige Estritori

Markel, a prominent insurance operation within Markel Group Inc., has announced the launch of its professional indemnity insurance solutions in Australia. This strategic move aims to address the growing demand for professional and financial risk coverage across various sectors. - read more

Australia's Construction Surge Poses New Challenges for Insurers

13 May 2026: Paige Estritori

Australia is experiencing a significant construction boom, encompassing high-rise residential towers, extensive infrastructure projects, and advanced data centres. This surge presents both opportunities and challenges for insurers navigating the evolving risk landscape. - read more

Insuret and ATL Unite to Strengthen Australia's Truck Insurance Landscape

12 May 2026: Paige Estritori

In a significant development for Australia's transport insurance sector, specialist underwriting agencies Insuret and ATL have announced their merger, creating a unified national platform dedicated to fleet and trucking insurance. This strategic alliance is poised to address the evolving and complex risk demands within the country's transport and mobility sectors. - read more

Regulatory Scrutiny Intensifies Over IAG's Proposed Acquisition of RAC Insurance

12 May 2026: Paige Estritori

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has escalated its scrutiny of Insurance Australia Group's (IAG) proposed acquisition of Western Australia's RAC Insurance, initiating a second-phase review due to potential competition concerns. This development underscores the regulator's commitment to maintaining a competitive insurance market, particularly in regions where market concentration could adversely affect consumers. - read more

Click for more Insurance News