Insurance Claim Rejected After Flight Crew Timing Violation

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The frustrated passenger incurred additional costs when his flight from Palermo to London was unexpectedly stopped because the crew had worked the maximum hours allowed by law. He expected full coverage for these expenses under his travel insurance policy.

However, Lloyd’s Australia, the insurer, denied the claim, stating that the travel policy’s clause on additional expenses and disruption coverage only applies to events such as strikes, riots, hijacks, civil unrest, adverse weather conditions, or accidents involving the mode of transport.

The claimant argued otherwise, insisting that the crew reaching its working hours limit was akin to industrial action such as strikes, implying that the insurer had a too narrow interpretation of the policy's disruption cover. He stated that the restriction on working hours is a precaution to prevent accidents, which aligns with the "spirit of the policy".

Yet, The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) did not accept this reasoning.

AFCA pointed out the scant information provided by the claimant which linked the flight cancellation directly to crew working hours being exceeded. They reinforced that this situation is distinct from a strike.

“A strike constitutes a deliberate refusal to work, whereas regulatory limits on work hours are a constraint and not a chosen action,” noted the AFCA's ombudsman. “Additionally, equating flight crew timing regulations with an accident scenario is not fitting, since the clause in question applies to actual incidents happening, not cancellations meant to forestall potential accidents.”

However, AFCA acknowledged a part of the travel policy which offers coverage for scenarios where a flight is delayed over six hours due to uncontrollable circumstances.

Under this provision, the insurer is required to compensate the complainant with the policy’s cap of $2000.

“Although the insurer claims that these circumstances are specifically excluded by the policy, they failed to indicate which exclusion they are relying on and provide justification for triggering it. Therefore, it is unconvincing that the insurer has adequately clarified its entitlement to decline or reduce the claim under this section,” AFCA concluded.

This case was originally reported by Insurance News Australia.

Published:Monday, 9th Sep 2024
Source: Paige Estritori

Please Note: If this information affects you, seek advice from a licensed professional.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

BizCover and Zurich Collaborate to Enhance Professional Indemnity Insurance for Australian SMEs

13 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori

In a significant development for Australian small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), BizCover has announced the addition of Zurich's Professional Indemnity (PI) insurance product to its online platform, effective from 3 March 2026. This collaboration aims to provide SMEs with enhanced access to comprehensive PI coverage, addressing a critical need in the business community. - read more

Markel Unveils Tailored Professional Indemnity Insurance for Australian Market

13 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori

In a significant development for the Australian insurance market, Markel, a US-based specialty insurer, has launched professional indemnity (PI) insurance products tailored specifically for Australian businesses. This strategic move comes in response to a notable reduction in PI insurance capacity over recent years, leaving many professionals seeking reliable coverage options. - read more

Sterling Insurance Enhances PI Offerings with Lloyd's Binder

13 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori

Sterling Insurance has successfully secured a new professional indemnity (PI) binding authority with Lloyd's, a move that promises to provide Australian brokers with greater control over product offerings and pricing structures. This development is part of Sterling's ongoing commitment to delivering tailored insurance solutions that meet the specific needs of niche and complex risk sectors. - read more

Insights from CHU's 2025 Strata Market Report

13 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori

CHU, Australia's leading strata insurance underwriting agency, has unveiled its 2025 State of the Strata Market report, offering a comprehensive analysis of the current landscape and future outlook for the strata industry. This report is particularly relevant for property owners and investors seeking to navigate the evolving strata insurance environment. - read more

ICA Advocates for Overhaul of Victoria's Strata Legislation

13 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori

The Insurance Council of Australia (ICA) has recently called for significant reforms to Victoria's strata legislation, highlighting concerns that poor governance and deferred maintenance are contributing to increased insurance premiums for the state's strata property owners. This appeal underscores the pressing need for legislative updates to enhance the management and maintenance of strata-titled properties. - read more

Click for more Insurance News