Insurance Claim Rejected After Flight Crew Timing Violation

3

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The frustrated passenger incurred additional costs when his flight from Palermo to London was unexpectedly stopped because the crew had worked the maximum hours allowed by law. He expected full coverage for these expenses under his travel insurance policy.

However, Lloyd’s Australia, the insurer, denied the claim, stating that the travel policy’s clause on additional expenses and disruption coverage only applies to events such as strikes, riots, hijacks, civil unrest, adverse weather conditions, or accidents involving the mode of transport.

The claimant argued otherwise, insisting that the crew reaching its working hours limit was akin to industrial action such as strikes, implying that the insurer had a too narrow interpretation of the policy's disruption cover. He stated that the restriction on working hours is a precaution to prevent accidents, which aligns with the "spirit of the policy".

Yet, The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) did not accept this reasoning.

AFCA pointed out the scant information provided by the claimant which linked the flight cancellation directly to crew working hours being exceeded. They reinforced that this situation is distinct from a strike.

“A strike constitutes a deliberate refusal to work, whereas regulatory limits on work hours are a constraint and not a chosen action,” noted the AFCA's ombudsman. “Additionally, equating flight crew timing regulations with an accident scenario is not fitting, since the clause in question applies to actual incidents happening, not cancellations meant to forestall potential accidents.”

However, AFCA acknowledged a part of the travel policy which offers coverage for scenarios where a flight is delayed over six hours due to uncontrollable circumstances.

Under this provision, the insurer is required to compensate the complainant with the policy’s cap of $2000.

“Although the insurer claims that these circumstances are specifically excluded by the policy, they failed to indicate which exclusion they are relying on and provide justification for triggering it. Therefore, it is unconvincing that the insurer has adequately clarified its entitlement to decline or reduce the claim under this section,” AFCA concluded.

This case was originally reported by Insurance News Australia.

Published:Monday, 9th Sep 2024
Source: Paige Estritori

Please Note: If this information affects you, seek advice from a licensed professional.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

QBE Insurance's Premium Growth Deceleration Impacts Share Value

29 Nov 2025: Paige Estritori

QBE Insurance Group, a prominent player in the Australian insurance sector, has recently experienced a notable decline in its share value, reaching a seven-month low. This downturn is primarily attributed to a slowdown in the company's premium rate growth during the third quarter of the 2025 fiscal year. - read more

ACCC Scrutinises IAG's Bid to Acquire RAC Insurance

29 Nov 2025: Paige Estritori

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has recently voiced concerns regarding Insurance Australia Group's (IAG) proposed acquisition of the Royal Automobile Club of Western Australia's (RAC) insurance business. Valued at A$1.35 billion, this deal aims to expand IAG's footprint in Western Australia. However, the ACCC warns that such consolidation could diminish competition in the state's motor and home insurance markets, potentially leading to higher premiums and reduced service quality for consumers. - read more

QBE Insurance Faces Market Challenges as Premium Growth Slows

29 Nov 2025: Paige Estritori

QBE Insurance Group, Australia's largest insurer by market value, has recently experienced a significant downturn in its share price, reaching a seven-month low. This decline is primarily attributed to a slowdown in the company's premium rate growth during the third quarter of fiscal 2025. For tradespeople across Australia, this development could have notable implications, particularly concerning insurance premiums and coverage options. - read more

ASIC Highlights Concerns Over Self-Managed Super Fund Advice

29 Nov 2025: Paige Estritori

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has recently raised significant concerns regarding the quality of financial advice provided to individuals about self-managed superannuation funds (SMSFs). This development is particularly relevant for tradespeople considering SMSFs as a means to manage their retirement savings. - read more

Regulators Call for Action as Australia Faces Retiree Wave

29 Nov 2025: Paige Estritori

Australia's financial regulators, the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) and the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), have issued a strong warning to the country's A$4.5 trillion superannuation industry. They emphasize the urgent need to prepare for an anticipated influx of approximately 2.5 million retirees over the next decade. This development holds significant implications for tradespeople, many of whom rely on superannuation funds for their retirement savings. - read more

Click for more Insurance News