Insurance Claim Rejected After Flight Crew Timing Violation

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The frustrated passenger incurred additional costs when his flight from Palermo to London was unexpectedly stopped because the crew had worked the maximum hours allowed by law. He expected full coverage for these expenses under his travel insurance policy.

However, Lloyd’s Australia, the insurer, denied the claim, stating that the travel policy’s clause on additional expenses and disruption coverage only applies to events such as strikes, riots, hijacks, civil unrest, adverse weather conditions, or accidents involving the mode of transport.

The claimant argued otherwise, insisting that the crew reaching its working hours limit was akin to industrial action such as strikes, implying that the insurer had a too narrow interpretation of the policy's disruption cover. He stated that the restriction on working hours is a precaution to prevent accidents, which aligns with the "spirit of the policy".

Yet, The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) did not accept this reasoning.

AFCA pointed out the scant information provided by the claimant which linked the flight cancellation directly to crew working hours being exceeded. They reinforced that this situation is distinct from a strike.

“A strike constitutes a deliberate refusal to work, whereas regulatory limits on work hours are a constraint and not a chosen action,” noted the AFCA's ombudsman. “Additionally, equating flight crew timing regulations with an accident scenario is not fitting, since the clause in question applies to actual incidents happening, not cancellations meant to forestall potential accidents.”

However, AFCA acknowledged a part of the travel policy which offers coverage for scenarios where a flight is delayed over six hours due to uncontrollable circumstances.

Under this provision, the insurer is required to compensate the complainant with the policy’s cap of $2000.

“Although the insurer claims that these circumstances are specifically excluded by the policy, they failed to indicate which exclusion they are relying on and provide justification for triggering it. Therefore, it is unconvincing that the insurer has adequately clarified its entitlement to decline or reduce the claim under this section,” AFCA concluded.

This case was originally reported by Insurance News Australia.

Published:Monday, 9th Sep 2024
Source: Paige Estritori

Please Note: If this information affects you, seek advice from a licensed professional.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

Navigating Rising Premiums and Cybersecurity Risks in Australia's Insurance Sector

16 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori

As we progress through 2026, Australia's insurance industry is grappling with significant challenges that are reshaping the landscape for both insurers and policyholders. Two primary concerns have emerged at the forefront: the affordability of premiums and the escalating threat of cyber incidents. - read more

Introducing Backd: Affordable Insurance for Casual and Contract Workers

15 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori

In a significant move to address the insurance needs of Australia's growing casual and contract workforce, TAL has partnered with global insurtech company Cover Genius to launch Backd. This innovative digital-only insurance product aims to provide accessible and affordable life and income protection coverage to workers who have traditionally faced challenges in obtaining such protection. - read more

Zurich's Home Loan Protection: Tailored Insurance for Mortgage Holders

15 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori

Zurich has unveiled its Home Loan Protection (HLP) product, a new insurance offering that combines life and income protection benefits tailored specifically for mortgage holders. This innovative cover automatically adjusts its premiums as the insured's mortgage balance decreases, ensuring that policyholders are only paying for the coverage they need. - read more

Australian General Insurance Premiums Set to Surpass $144 Billion by 2029

15 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori

The Australian general insurance industry is on a trajectory for substantial growth, with direct written premiums (DWP) projected to exceed $144 billion by 2029. This forecast, provided by data and analytics firm GlobalData, reflects a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) driven by increasing demand for coverage in response to the rising frequency of natural disasters. - read more

Australia's A&H Insurance Sector Set for Steady Growth

15 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori

Australia's accident and health (A&H) insurance sector is on track for significant growth, with projections indicating an annual increase exceeding 4% through to 2030. This positive outlook is largely attributed to advancements in digital distribution channels and escalating health-related expenses. - read more

Click for more Insurance News