Insurance Claim Rejected After Flight Crew Timing Violation

3

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The frustrated passenger incurred additional costs when his flight from Palermo to London was unexpectedly stopped because the crew had worked the maximum hours allowed by law. He expected full coverage for these expenses under his travel insurance policy.

However, Lloyd’s Australia, the insurer, denied the claim, stating that the travel policy’s clause on additional expenses and disruption coverage only applies to events such as strikes, riots, hijacks, civil unrest, adverse weather conditions, or accidents involving the mode of transport.

The claimant argued otherwise, insisting that the crew reaching its working hours limit was akin to industrial action such as strikes, implying that the insurer had a too narrow interpretation of the policy's disruption cover. He stated that the restriction on working hours is a precaution to prevent accidents, which aligns with the "spirit of the policy".

Yet, The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) did not accept this reasoning.

AFCA pointed out the scant information provided by the claimant which linked the flight cancellation directly to crew working hours being exceeded. They reinforced that this situation is distinct from a strike.

“A strike constitutes a deliberate refusal to work, whereas regulatory limits on work hours are a constraint and not a chosen action,” noted the AFCA's ombudsman. “Additionally, equating flight crew timing regulations with an accident scenario is not fitting, since the clause in question applies to actual incidents happening, not cancellations meant to forestall potential accidents.”

However, AFCA acknowledged a part of the travel policy which offers coverage for scenarios where a flight is delayed over six hours due to uncontrollable circumstances.

Under this provision, the insurer is required to compensate the complainant with the policy’s cap of $2000.

“Although the insurer claims that these circumstances are specifically excluded by the policy, they failed to indicate which exclusion they are relying on and provide justification for triggering it. Therefore, it is unconvincing that the insurer has adequately clarified its entitlement to decline or reduce the claim under this section,” AFCA concluded.

This case was originally reported by Insurance News Australia.

Published:Monday, 9th Sep 2024
Source: Paige Estritori

Please Note: If this information affects you, seek advice from a licensed professional.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

ICA Proposes Measures to Mitigate Escalating Motor Insurance Premiums

09 Feb 2026: Paige Estritori

The Insurance Council of Australia (ICA) has released a policy paper titled 'Motor Insurance Policy Paper - A Roadmap for Reducing Rising Premiums,' highlighting the urgent need for coordinated action to address systemic cost drivers behind the 42% increase in comprehensive motor insurance premiums since 2019. - read more

Budget Direct Triumphs as Australia's Top Insurer in 2026

09 Feb 2026: Paige Estritori

In a remarkable achievement, Budget Direct has been honoured as the inaugural 'Insurer of the Year' at the 2026 Finder Provider of the Year Awards. This prestigious recognition underscores the company's unwavering commitment to delivering exceptional value and service to Australian policyholders. - read more

Australian Insurers Face Challenges in Cyber Risk Readiness

09 Feb 2026: Paige Estritori

Recent findings from the PwC Insurance Banana Skins Survey have raised concerns about the preparedness of Australian insurers in managing emerging risks, particularly in the realms of cyber security and artificial intelligence (AI). The survey indicates that Australian insurers scored 6.6% lower on the Preparedness Index compared to their global counterparts, highlighting a significant gap in readiness. - read more

Significant Decline in Australian Commercial Insurance Rates

09 Feb 2026: Paige Estritori

In a notable development for the Australian insurance market, commercial insurance rates experienced a substantial decline of 12% in the fourth quarter of 2025. This decrease, as reported by Marsh's Global Insurance Market Index, represents the most significant drop among the eight regions monitored and marks the steepest reduction since the Pacific rates began to decrease in early 2024. - read more

Treasury Initiates Review of Professional Indemnity Insurance to Support CSLR

09 Feb 2026: Paige Estritori

The Australian Treasury has commenced a consultation process aimed at improving the effectiveness of professional indemnity (PI) insurance, with the goal of strengthening the Compensation Scheme of Last Resort (CSLR). This initiative seeks to gather stakeholder feedback on the current operation of PI insurance and explore opportunities for enhancement. - read more

Click for more Insurance News