Insurance Claim Rejected After Flight Crew Timing Violation

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The frustrated passenger incurred additional costs when his flight from Palermo to London was unexpectedly stopped because the crew had worked the maximum hours allowed by law. He expected full coverage for these expenses under his travel insurance policy.

However, Lloyd’s Australia, the insurer, denied the claim, stating that the travel policy’s clause on additional expenses and disruption coverage only applies to events such as strikes, riots, hijacks, civil unrest, adverse weather conditions, or accidents involving the mode of transport.

The claimant argued otherwise, insisting that the crew reaching its working hours limit was akin to industrial action such as strikes, implying that the insurer had a too narrow interpretation of the policy's disruption cover. He stated that the restriction on working hours is a precaution to prevent accidents, which aligns with the "spirit of the policy".

Yet, The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) did not accept this reasoning.

AFCA pointed out the scant information provided by the claimant which linked the flight cancellation directly to crew working hours being exceeded. They reinforced that this situation is distinct from a strike.

“A strike constitutes a deliberate refusal to work, whereas regulatory limits on work hours are a constraint and not a chosen action,” noted the AFCA's ombudsman. “Additionally, equating flight crew timing regulations with an accident scenario is not fitting, since the clause in question applies to actual incidents happening, not cancellations meant to forestall potential accidents.”

However, AFCA acknowledged a part of the travel policy which offers coverage for scenarios where a flight is delayed over six hours due to uncontrollable circumstances.

Under this provision, the insurer is required to compensate the complainant with the policy’s cap of $2000.

“Although the insurer claims that these circumstances are specifically excluded by the policy, they failed to indicate which exclusion they are relying on and provide justification for triggering it. Therefore, it is unconvincing that the insurer has adequately clarified its entitlement to decline or reduce the claim under this section,” AFCA concluded.

This case was originally reported by Insurance News Australia.

Published:Monday, 9th Sep 2024
Source: Paige Estritori

Please Note: If this information affects you, seek advice from a licensed professional.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

Australian General Insurers Report Record 19% Return on Equity in FY25

04 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori

Australia's general insurance industry has reported a remarkable financial performance for the 2025 financial year (FY25), achieving a return on equity (ROE) of 19%, the highest in a decade. This significant milestone reflects a combination of favourable conditions and strategic premium adjustments within the sector. - read more

Insurance Australia Group Reports Strong FY25 Results and Upgrades FY26 Outlook

04 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori

Insurance Australia Group (IAG) has announced robust financial results for the fiscal year 2025 (FY25), reporting a 4.3% increase in gross written premium (GWP) to $17.1 billion. This performance has led the company to upgrade its guidance for the upcoming fiscal year 2026 (FY26), signalling confidence in sustained growth. - read more

Australian Insurers Face Challenges in Risk Preparedness Compared to Global Peers

04 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori

Recent findings from PwC's Insurance Banana Skins Survey indicate that Australian insurers are trailing their global counterparts in preparedness for emerging risks. The survey, which gathered insights from 698 insurance executives across 42 territories, reveals that Australian insurers scored 6.6% lower on the Preparedness Index compared to the global industry average. - read more

IAG CEO Predicts Ongoing Insurance Premium Hikes

04 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori

Insurance Australia Group (IAG), a leading insurer in Australia, has reported a significant 91% increase in net profit for the first half of the 2024-2025 financial year, reaching $778 million. This surge is largely attributed to favourable weather conditions resulting in fewer natural disaster claims. ([abc.net.au](https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-02-14/iag-ceo-nick-hawkins-warns-of-further-premium-increases/104931074?utm_source=openai)) - read more

Climate Change Impacting Home Insurance Costs

04 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori

Insurance Australia Group (IAG) has issued a warning to Australian homeowners about the escalating impact of climate change on home insurance premiums. The insurer's recent report indicates that the increasing frequency and severity of weather events are leading to higher claims costs, which are subsequently driving up premiums. ([abc.net.au](https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-11-04/climate-change-plays-role-in-growing-home-insurance-iag-warns/105964560?utm_source=openai)) - read more

Click for more Insurance News