Insurance Claim Rejected After Flight Crew Timing Violation

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The frustrated passenger incurred additional costs when his flight from Palermo to London was unexpectedly stopped because the crew had worked the maximum hours allowed by law. He expected full coverage for these expenses under his travel insurance policy.

However, Lloyd’s Australia, the insurer, denied the claim, stating that the travel policy’s clause on additional expenses and disruption coverage only applies to events such as strikes, riots, hijacks, civil unrest, adverse weather conditions, or accidents involving the mode of transport.

The claimant argued otherwise, insisting that the crew reaching its working hours limit was akin to industrial action such as strikes, implying that the insurer had a too narrow interpretation of the policy's disruption cover. He stated that the restriction on working hours is a precaution to prevent accidents, which aligns with the "spirit of the policy".

Yet, The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) did not accept this reasoning.

AFCA pointed out the scant information provided by the claimant which linked the flight cancellation directly to crew working hours being exceeded. They reinforced that this situation is distinct from a strike.

“A strike constitutes a deliberate refusal to work, whereas regulatory limits on work hours are a constraint and not a chosen action,” noted the AFCA's ombudsman. “Additionally, equating flight crew timing regulations with an accident scenario is not fitting, since the clause in question applies to actual incidents happening, not cancellations meant to forestall potential accidents.”

However, AFCA acknowledged a part of the travel policy which offers coverage for scenarios where a flight is delayed over six hours due to uncontrollable circumstances.

Under this provision, the insurer is required to compensate the complainant with the policy’s cap of $2000.

“Although the insurer claims that these circumstances are specifically excluded by the policy, they failed to indicate which exclusion they are relying on and provide justification for triggering it. Therefore, it is unconvincing that the insurer has adequately clarified its entitlement to decline or reduce the claim under this section,” AFCA concluded.

This case was originally reported by Insurance News Australia.

Published:Monday, 9th Sep 2024
Author: Paige Estritori

Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

APRA's 2026 Insurance Summit: Tackling Climate Risks and Affordability

16 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) is set to host the 2026 AFR Insurance Summit on June 16 at The Fullerton Hotel in Sydney. This pivotal event will bring together industry leaders to address pressing issues within Australia's insurance sector, with a particular emphasis on climate-related risks, insurance affordability, and maintaining public trust. - read more

Dynamic Insurance's Legal Action Against Major Insurers

16 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

Dynamic Insurance Services has initiated legal proceedings against Steadfast Group, QBE Insurance, and Allianz Australia Insurance, alleging coordinated actions that restricted its access to essential insurance products. The lawsuit, filed in March 2026, claims that these companies engaged in practices that adversely affected Dynamic's business operations. - read more

IAG's June 2026 Distribution on Hybrid Capital Notes

16 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

Insurance Australia Group Limited (IAG) has announced a quarterly distribution on its ASX-listed hybrid capital notes (IAGPF), reflecting the company's ongoing commitment to its capital management strategy. For the quarter ending June 14, 2026, IAG will pay a distribution of AUD 1.6605 per note, based on an annualized rate of 6.6603% after adjustment for franking. This payment is scheduled for June 15, 2026, with the record date set for June 3, 2026. - read more

APRA's Intervention: Freezing Unjustified Premium Hikes in Commercial Auto Insurance

15 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

In March 2026, the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) took decisive action to address significant premium hikes in the commercial auto insurance sector. Responding to widespread industry concerns, APRA issued emergency regulations to freeze unjustified baseline premium increases exceeding 25%, pending external review. This intervention aims to protect independent transport operators and logistics enterprises from immediate financial strain. - read more

Soft Market Conditions Persist in Australian Commercial Insurance Through First Half of 2026

15 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

The Australian commercial insurance market has maintained its soft stance through the first half of 2026, characterized by competitive pricing, expanded insurer capacity, and broad underwriting appetites. This trend, detailed in the latest Insurance Market Trends and Outlook report released by EBM Insurance & Risk on 11 May 2026, reflects a market shaped by heightened competition and stabilizing reinsurance conditions. - read more

Click for more Insurance News