Insurance Claim Rejected After Flight Crew Timing Violation

3

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The frustrated passenger incurred additional costs when his flight from Palermo to London was unexpectedly stopped because the crew had worked the maximum hours allowed by law. He expected full coverage for these expenses under his travel insurance policy.

However, Lloyd’s Australia, the insurer, denied the claim, stating that the travel policy’s clause on additional expenses and disruption coverage only applies to events such as strikes, riots, hijacks, civil unrest, adverse weather conditions, or accidents involving the mode of transport.

The claimant argued otherwise, insisting that the crew reaching its working hours limit was akin to industrial action such as strikes, implying that the insurer had a too narrow interpretation of the policy's disruption cover. He stated that the restriction on working hours is a precaution to prevent accidents, which aligns with the "spirit of the policy".

Yet, The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) did not accept this reasoning.

AFCA pointed out the scant information provided by the claimant which linked the flight cancellation directly to crew working hours being exceeded. They reinforced that this situation is distinct from a strike.

“A strike constitutes a deliberate refusal to work, whereas regulatory limits on work hours are a constraint and not a chosen action,” noted the AFCA's ombudsman. “Additionally, equating flight crew timing regulations with an accident scenario is not fitting, since the clause in question applies to actual incidents happening, not cancellations meant to forestall potential accidents.”

However, AFCA acknowledged a part of the travel policy which offers coverage for scenarios where a flight is delayed over six hours due to uncontrollable circumstances.

Under this provision, the insurer is required to compensate the complainant with the policy’s cap of $2000.

“Although the insurer claims that these circumstances are specifically excluded by the policy, they failed to indicate which exclusion they are relying on and provide justification for triggering it. Therefore, it is unconvincing that the insurer has adequately clarified its entitlement to decline or reduce the claim under this section,” AFCA concluded.

This case was originally reported by Insurance News Australia.

Published:Monday, 9th Sep 2024
Source: Paige Estritori

Please Note: If this information affects you, seek advice from a licensed professional.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

Surge in Mental Health Claims Reshapes Australia's Life Insurance Landscape

26 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori

Australia's life insurance sector is witnessing a significant transformation, with mental health conditions emerging as the predominant cause of Total and Permanent Disability (TPD) claims. Recent data from the Council of Australian Life Insurers (CALI) indicates that mental health-related TPD claims now constitute nearly one-third of all such claims, highlighting a profound shift in the factors leading Australians to exit the workforce permanently. - read more

Australian Life Insurers Report Significant Profit Growth in FY25

26 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori

The Australian life insurance industry has reported a remarkable financial turnaround in the fiscal year 2025, with earnings more than doubling to $360 million, according to the latest figures from the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA). This 210% increase in profit after income tax marks a significant recovery from previous years' losses and underscores the sector's resilience and adaptability. - read more

Australia's General Insurance Industry Achieves Record $6.1 Billion Profit in 2024

26 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori

Australia's general insurance sector has reported an unprecedented after-tax profit of $6.1 billion for the year 2024, according to KPMG's General Insurance Insights report. This figure is three times higher than the five-year average of $2 billion, marking a significant milestone in the industry's financial performance. - read more

Australian Insurers' $6.1 Billion Profit Sparks Affordability Concerns

26 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori

In 2024, Australia's insurance industry reported an after-tax profit of $6.1 billion, a significant increase from the five-year average of $2 billion. This surge in profitability is attributed to substantial premium hikes and a year with fewer severe weather events. - read more

Rising Insurance Premiums Prompt Calls for Industry Reform

26 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori

Recent data indicates a significant rise in insurance premiums across Australia, with home insurance premiums increasing by 16% on average over the past year. Some insurers, such as Kogan, RAC, and Honey, have raised rates by over 30%, leading to growing concerns about affordability for consumers. - read more

Click for more Insurance News