Insurance Claim Rejected After Flight Crew Timing Violation

3

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The frustrated passenger incurred additional costs when his flight from Palermo to London was unexpectedly stopped because the crew had worked the maximum hours allowed by law. He expected full coverage for these expenses under his travel insurance policy.

However, Lloyd’s Australia, the insurer, denied the claim, stating that the travel policy’s clause on additional expenses and disruption coverage only applies to events such as strikes, riots, hijacks, civil unrest, adverse weather conditions, or accidents involving the mode of transport.

The claimant argued otherwise, insisting that the crew reaching its working hours limit was akin to industrial action such as strikes, implying that the insurer had a too narrow interpretation of the policy's disruption cover. He stated that the restriction on working hours is a precaution to prevent accidents, which aligns with the "spirit of the policy".

Yet, The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) did not accept this reasoning.

AFCA pointed out the scant information provided by the claimant which linked the flight cancellation directly to crew working hours being exceeded. They reinforced that this situation is distinct from a strike.

“A strike constitutes a deliberate refusal to work, whereas regulatory limits on work hours are a constraint and not a chosen action,” noted the AFCA's ombudsman. “Additionally, equating flight crew timing regulations with an accident scenario is not fitting, since the clause in question applies to actual incidents happening, not cancellations meant to forestall potential accidents.”

However, AFCA acknowledged a part of the travel policy which offers coverage for scenarios where a flight is delayed over six hours due to uncontrollable circumstances.

Under this provision, the insurer is required to compensate the complainant with the policy’s cap of $2000.

“Although the insurer claims that these circumstances are specifically excluded by the policy, they failed to indicate which exclusion they are relying on and provide justification for triggering it. Therefore, it is unconvincing that the insurer has adequately clarified its entitlement to decline or reduce the claim under this section,” AFCA concluded.

This case was originally reported by Insurance News Australia.

Published:Monday, 9th Sep 2024
Source: Paige Estritori

Please Note: If this information affects you, seek advice from a licensed professional.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

AUSactive and Health Partners Collaborate to Enhance Fitness Service Accessibility

13 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori

AUSactive, Australia's peak body for the exercise and active health sector, has announced a significant partnership with Health Partners, a not-for-profit health fund with over 85 years of service to South Australians. This collaboration recognises eligible AUSactive Personal Trainers and fitness businesses as approved providers, allowing Health Partners members to claim benefits for personal training sessions, classes, and gym memberships under their Extras policy when part of a medically necessary health management plan. - read more

AIA Australia Teams Up with Peloton and Specialized to Encourage Active Lifestyles

13 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori

AIA Australia, a leading life, health, and wellbeing insurer, has announced partnerships with global fitness company Peloton and premium cycling brand Specialized. These collaborations aim to provide AIA Vitality members with significant discounts and incentives to promote cycling, both at home and outdoors. - read more

Australian Insurers Achieve Record Profits Amid Rising Premiums

13 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori

In 2024, Australia's insurance sector reported an after-tax profit of $6.1 billion, a significant increase from the five-year average of $2 billion. This surge is primarily attributed to substantial premium hikes and a relatively calm year concerning natural disasters. - read more

Government Consultancy Contracts Near $1 Billion Amid Outsourcing Reduction Efforts

13 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori

Recent research indicates that the Australian federal government signed contracts worth nearly $1 billion with consultancy firms in the last financial year, marking a 48% increase from the previous year. This development comes despite the government's commitment to reduce reliance on external consultants. - read more

Construction Cost Surge and Labour Shortages Reshape Australian Insurance Claims

13 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori

The Australian insurance industry is currently navigating a challenging landscape shaped by escalating construction costs and persistent labour shortages. These factors are significantly influencing the nature and volume of insurance claims, particularly within the construction sector. - read more

Click for more Insurance News