Insurance Claim Rejected After Flight Crew Timing Violation

3

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The frustrated passenger incurred additional costs when his flight from Palermo to London was unexpectedly stopped because the crew had worked the maximum hours allowed by law. He expected full coverage for these expenses under his travel insurance policy.

However, Lloyd’s Australia, the insurer, denied the claim, stating that the travel policy’s clause on additional expenses and disruption coverage only applies to events such as strikes, riots, hijacks, civil unrest, adverse weather conditions, or accidents involving the mode of transport.

The claimant argued otherwise, insisting that the crew reaching its working hours limit was akin to industrial action such as strikes, implying that the insurer had a too narrow interpretation of the policy's disruption cover. He stated that the restriction on working hours is a precaution to prevent accidents, which aligns with the "spirit of the policy".

Yet, The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) did not accept this reasoning.

AFCA pointed out the scant information provided by the claimant which linked the flight cancellation directly to crew working hours being exceeded. They reinforced that this situation is distinct from a strike.

“A strike constitutes a deliberate refusal to work, whereas regulatory limits on work hours are a constraint and not a chosen action,” noted the AFCA's ombudsman. “Additionally, equating flight crew timing regulations with an accident scenario is not fitting, since the clause in question applies to actual incidents happening, not cancellations meant to forestall potential accidents.”

However, AFCA acknowledged a part of the travel policy which offers coverage for scenarios where a flight is delayed over six hours due to uncontrollable circumstances.

Under this provision, the insurer is required to compensate the complainant with the policy’s cap of $2000.

“Although the insurer claims that these circumstances are specifically excluded by the policy, they failed to indicate which exclusion they are relying on and provide justification for triggering it. Therefore, it is unconvincing that the insurer has adequately clarified its entitlement to decline or reduce the claim under this section,” AFCA concluded.

This case was originally reported by Insurance News Australia.

Published:Monday, 9th Sep 2024
Source: Paige Estritori

Please Note: If this information affects you, seek advice from a licensed professional.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

Allianz Australia and AWP Australia Penalised for Misleading Practices

06 Feb 2026: Paige Estritori

In a significant regulatory action, Allianz Australia and its subsidiary, AWP Australia, have been fined $16.8 million for making false and misleading statements to consumers. This penalty underscores the critical need for transparency and honesty within the insurance industry. - read more

Rising Insurance Premiums Challenge Northern Australian Homeowners

06 Feb 2026: Paige Estritori

Homeowners in Northern Australia are grappling with substantial increases in insurance premiums, despite the establishment of a cyclone reinsurance pool intended to alleviate such financial burdens. This situation raises critical questions about the pool's effectiveness and the broader challenges facing the insurance industry in high-risk regions. - read more

Record Profits for Australian Insurers Amid Premium Increases

06 Feb 2026: Paige Estritori

Australia's insurance industry has reported an after-tax profit of $6.1 billion for the year 2024, a figure that is three times higher than the five-year average of $2 billion. This substantial increase in profitability coincides with significant hikes in insurance premiums across various sectors. - read more

Escalating Construction Costs Impact Insurance Claims and Repair Timelines

06 Feb 2026: Paige Estritori

The Australian construction industry is currently grappling with significant cost escalations, which are having a direct impact on insurance claims and repair timelines. According to a recent report by Crawford & Company, various factors are contributing to this trend, including rising material prices, labour shortages, and an increase in builder insolvencies. - read more

IAG Partners with Codafication to Streamline Property Claims Management

06 Feb 2026: Paige Estritori

Insurance Australia Group (IAG), a leading insurer in Australia, has announced a strategic partnership with Brisbane-based insurtech company Codafication to enhance its property claims management process. This collaboration introduces the Crunchwork platform, designed to automate workflows and provide real-time updates to all parties involved in the claims process. - read more

Click for more Insurance News