Insurance Claim Rejected After Flight Crew Timing Violation

3

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The frustrated passenger incurred additional costs when his flight from Palermo to London was unexpectedly stopped because the crew had worked the maximum hours allowed by law. He expected full coverage for these expenses under his travel insurance policy.

However, Lloyd’s Australia, the insurer, denied the claim, stating that the travel policy’s clause on additional expenses and disruption coverage only applies to events such as strikes, riots, hijacks, civil unrest, adverse weather conditions, or accidents involving the mode of transport.

The claimant argued otherwise, insisting that the crew reaching its working hours limit was akin to industrial action such as strikes, implying that the insurer had a too narrow interpretation of the policy's disruption cover. He stated that the restriction on working hours is a precaution to prevent accidents, which aligns with the "spirit of the policy".

Yet, The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) did not accept this reasoning.

AFCA pointed out the scant information provided by the claimant which linked the flight cancellation directly to crew working hours being exceeded. They reinforced that this situation is distinct from a strike.

“A strike constitutes a deliberate refusal to work, whereas regulatory limits on work hours are a constraint and not a chosen action,” noted the AFCA's ombudsman. “Additionally, equating flight crew timing regulations with an accident scenario is not fitting, since the clause in question applies to actual incidents happening, not cancellations meant to forestall potential accidents.”

However, AFCA acknowledged a part of the travel policy which offers coverage for scenarios where a flight is delayed over six hours due to uncontrollable circumstances.

Under this provision, the insurer is required to compensate the complainant with the policy’s cap of $2000.

“Although the insurer claims that these circumstances are specifically excluded by the policy, they failed to indicate which exclusion they are relying on and provide justification for triggering it. Therefore, it is unconvincing that the insurer has adequately clarified its entitlement to decline or reduce the claim under this section,” AFCA concluded.

This case was originally reported by Insurance News Australia.

Published:Monday, 9th Sep 2024
Source: Paige Estritori

Please Note: If this information affects you, seek advice from a licensed professional.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

Beauty Therapist Successfully Challenges Insurer Over Flood Damage Claim

23 Nov 2025: Paige Estritori

In a significant ruling, a beauty therapist has achieved partial coverage for damages after contesting her insurer's application of a flood exclusion clause. This case underscores the complexities beauticians face when navigating insurance claims related to water damage. - read more

ASIC Intensifies Oversight on Insurance Pricing and Claims Handling

23 Nov 2025: Paige Estritori

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has unveiled new enforcement priorities for the upcoming year, placing a spotlight on insurance pricing, claims handling, and complaints processes. This move aims to enhance consumer protection and ensure fair practices within the insurance industry. - read more

Melbourne Hairdresser Successfully Claims Business Interruption Due to Pandemic

23 Nov 2025: Paige Estritori

A Melbourne-based hairdressing salon has won a business interruption (BI) insurance dispute after demonstrating that a local COVID-19 outbreak led to a significant decline in revenue, even before government-imposed lockdowns. - read more

Revolutionising Crop Insurance: DAS Unveils Cutting-Edge Data Tool

22 Nov 2025: Paige Estritori

Digital Agriculture Services (DAS) has introduced an innovative crop insurance solution in Australia, leveraging machine learning, automapping, and geospatial data to improve policy accuracy. This tool is designed to assist insurers, underwriters, brokers, and loss adjusters by precisely locating insured paddocks and identifying crop types, yields, and other critical details. - read more

Significant Drop in Farm Liability Claims Reflects Improved Safety Measures

22 Nov 2025: Paige Estritori

WFI Insurance has reported a notable decrease in farm liability claims across most categories, including a 75% reduction in falls from height over the past year. This decline suggests that Australian farmers are adopting more effective safety practices, leading to fewer accidents and injuries. - read more

Click for more Insurance News