Insurance Claim Rejected After Flight Crew Timing Violation

3

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The frustrated passenger incurred additional costs when his flight from Palermo to London was unexpectedly stopped because the crew had worked the maximum hours allowed by law. He expected full coverage for these expenses under his travel insurance policy.

However, Lloyd’s Australia, the insurer, denied the claim, stating that the travel policy’s clause on additional expenses and disruption coverage only applies to events such as strikes, riots, hijacks, civil unrest, adverse weather conditions, or accidents involving the mode of transport.

The claimant argued otherwise, insisting that the crew reaching its working hours limit was akin to industrial action such as strikes, implying that the insurer had a too narrow interpretation of the policy's disruption cover. He stated that the restriction on working hours is a precaution to prevent accidents, which aligns with the "spirit of the policy".

Yet, The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) did not accept this reasoning.

AFCA pointed out the scant information provided by the claimant which linked the flight cancellation directly to crew working hours being exceeded. They reinforced that this situation is distinct from a strike.

“A strike constitutes a deliberate refusal to work, whereas regulatory limits on work hours are a constraint and not a chosen action,” noted the AFCA's ombudsman. “Additionally, equating flight crew timing regulations with an accident scenario is not fitting, since the clause in question applies to actual incidents happening, not cancellations meant to forestall potential accidents.”

However, AFCA acknowledged a part of the travel policy which offers coverage for scenarios where a flight is delayed over six hours due to uncontrollable circumstances.

Under this provision, the insurer is required to compensate the complainant with the policy’s cap of $2000.

“Although the insurer claims that these circumstances are specifically excluded by the policy, they failed to indicate which exclusion they are relying on and provide justification for triggering it. Therefore, it is unconvincing that the insurer has adequately clarified its entitlement to decline or reduce the claim under this section,” AFCA concluded.

This case was originally reported by Insurance News Australia.

Published:Monday, 9th Sep 2024
Source: Paige Estritori

Please Note: If this information affects you, seek advice from a licensed professional.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

Revolutionising Crop Insurance: DAS Unveils Cutting-Edge Data Tool

22 Nov 2025: Paige Estritori

Digital Agriculture Services (DAS) has introduced an innovative crop insurance solution in Australia, leveraging machine learning, automapping, and geospatial data to improve policy accuracy. This tool is designed to assist insurers, underwriters, brokers, and loss adjusters by precisely locating insured paddocks and identifying crop types, yields, and other critical details. - read more

Significant Drop in Farm Liability Claims Reflects Improved Safety Measures

22 Nov 2025: Paige Estritori

WFI Insurance has reported a notable decrease in farm liability claims across most categories, including a 75% reduction in falls from height over the past year. This decline suggests that Australian farmers are adopting more effective safety practices, leading to fewer accidents and injuries. - read more

Insuregroup Achieves Significant Growth in Truck Insurance Policies

22 Nov 2025: Paige Estritori

Insuregroup, a specialist insurance brokerage serving Australia's transport and logistics sector, has recently achieved a significant milestone by processing over 10,000 insurance policies since its inception. This accomplishment includes a 25% year-on-year increase in policy count, highlighting the escalating demand for comprehensive truck insurance solutions among Australian freight operators. - read more

ACCC Greenlights Allianz's Acquisition of RAA Insurance

22 Nov 2025: Paige Estritori

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has recently approved Allianz's acquisition of RAA Insurance Holdings, a decision that has sparked discussions about the future landscape of Australia's insurance industry. This approval follows closely on the heels of the ACCC's earlier endorsement of Insurance Australia Group's (IAG) acquisition of RACQ Insurance, marking a trend towards consolidation within the sector. - read more

Australian Fleet Operators Confront Escalating Collision Risks

22 Nov 2025: Paige Estritori

Australia's transport and haulage sector is currently navigating a period of heightened operational risk, marked by an uptick in both the frequency and severity of motor collision claims. This trend underscores the pressing need for fleet operators to adopt proactive risk management strategies and leverage advanced insurance solutions to safeguard their operations. - read more

Click for more Insurance News