AFCA Rebukes IAG Over Mismanaged Flood Damage Claim
AFCA Rebukes IAG Over Mismanaged Flood Damage Claim
The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.
Insurance Australia Group (IAG) has been mandated to reexamine a denied claim and offer compensation to a driver whose "vulnerable status" was overlooked.
Following a flood incident in remote Northern Territory, the driver submitted a claim on March 9 last year after his car was trapped in the floodwaters. He was transporting a friend to retrieve her vehicle when the floodwater immobilized his Holden Commodore, valued at $32,000.
The driver reported significant water intrusion into the vehicle, compromising its engine and electronics. He and his passenger needed over 15 minutes to push the vehicle out from the water.
IAG arranged for the car to be transported to Darwin for inspection. In June, the mechanic’s report indicated no water damage to the engine or interior, yet traces of water were discovered in its oil.
Another mechanic’s assessment found no water in the air filters or throttle but noted rust corrosion, indicative of water presence.
Due to the claim being filed six days after the policy initiation, IAG flagged the claim's legitimacy and handed it over to their fraud investigation unit. The unit interviewed both the driver and passenger and demanded multiple documents, including mobile records, a car purchase contract, and service history.
According to the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA), the driver submitted all requested documentation with the exception of his bank statements. Unfortunately, his mobile phone records were not provided in the correct format.
The insurer contended that further investigation was contingent on receiving all requested information and upheld their decision to decline the claim pending additional data.
However, AFCA challenged IAG’s stance, arguing the driver had sufficiently complied with the investigation despite the missing documentation. The authority stated that evidence from the two expert reports supported the driver’s account of events.
The authority emphasized the presence of water in the vehicle, citing the seized engine, evident corrosion in all cylinders, the presence of surface rust, and the milky oil in the oil filter, all hinting at water contamination.
Additionally, AFCA criticized IAG for not recognizing the driver’s vulnerability, stemming from his remote residence, financial duress, and health issues, including a broken leg.
AFCA noted that the insurer's mishandling of the claim had caused avoidable stress and delays for the driver. Consequentially, IAG was compelled to pay a penalty of $5400 for non-financial losses.
"The insurer should either properly execute its investigation or make a claim decision based on the available information," AFCA stated. "Unreasonable demands for additional information have resulted in undue stress for the claimant. IAG must compensate him for the resulting inconvenience and emotional distress."
Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.
NSW Fair Trading’s criminal proceedings against Network Strata Services Pty Ltd, trading as Netstrata, have pushed strata governance and insurance transparency back into the national spotlight. The regulator alleges the company and its director and licensee in charge breached statutory obligations connected with strata scheme management in New South Wales, including alleged failures around conflicts of interest, undisclosed financial benefits and information provided to the regulator. - read more
A fresh dispute over the proposed Insurance Brokers Code of Practice has sharpened the focus on transparency for Australian small businesses. Industry figure John Trowbridge has criticised gaps in the draft code, particularly around whether brokers should disclose commissions and other remuneration to all clients, not only those captured by narrower product or client categories. - read more
A recent Australian Financial Complaints Authority decision has put a spotlight on a detail that can be easy to overlook: how an income protection policy defines income. In the case, a policyholder receiving payments under an employer-arranged group income protection policy argued that regular sales commissions should be counted when calculating his pre-disability income. - read more
A fresh dispute over Australia’s insurance broking standards has put transparency back in the spotlight for small business policyholders, including personal trainers, fitness instructors and studio operators. On 17 July 2026, several consumer and strata owner groups withdrew from consultation on the National Insurance Brokers Association’s rewritten Insurance Brokers Code of Practice, arguing that industry self-regulation does not go far enough on conflicted payments and commission disclosure. - read more
Australia’s life insurance sector has welcomed the Federal Government’s updated expectations for APRA and ASIC, a policy signal that could shape how insurers balance consumer protection, affordability and innovation. The new expectations ask the regulators to keep the financial system safe and stable while also supporting competition, productivity and proportionate oversight. For life insurance customers, the practical question is whether that balance leads to clearer products, better service and cover that remains within reach. - read more
Home insurance is an essential safeguard for homeowners in Australia, acting as a financial shield against unexpected damages and losses. It offers a sense of security, knowing that your largest asset is protected should the unforeseen occur. With the diverse range of natural perils that Australians face, from bushfires to floods, securing a home insurance policy is not just wise but almost indispensable. - read more
Household insurance is a crucial safety net for both homeowners and renters in Australia, offering protection against a range of potential damages and losses. Navigating the insurance claims process, however, can often be challenging and fraught with pitfalls. - read more
Understanding the significance of insurance in managing your finances is crucial. It acts as a safeguard, providing a buffer against unexpected losses or damage to your most valuable possessions. However, the costs associated with this necessary protection can be challenging to manage, especially when it comes to fitting insurance premiums into a monthly budget. - read more
Home and Contents Insurance is a type of insurance policy that covers any damage or loss that may occur to your property, as well as the contents within it. This can include damages caused by fire, flood, theft and other unforeseen circumstances. In Australia, Home and Contents Insurance is of utmost importance due to the increasing rates of natural disasters such as bushfires and floods. - read more
In the face of unpredictable climate patterns and wild weather, safeguarding your home becomes a top priority, especially in a country like Australia. Choosing the right home and contents insurance is essential in providing a financial safety net against the forces of nature. With this in mind, the importance of insurance cannot be overstated, acting as a crucial buffer to protect your property and belongings. - read more
Knowledgebase
Waiting Period: The time period that must pass after filing a claim before the insurance coverage becomes effective or benefits are paid.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.